The Shocking Controversy of ABA Therapy

AUT_Blog_DTOP_BelowTitle_300x250

A note to parents and caregivers: This article may not be easy to read. But it is not meant to shame or indict you, rather to ensure your children with autism live the best lives they can. You love your kids and you want what’s best for them. You want them to thrive and be successful and happy. I know you would NEVER do anything to intentionally harm them. And that’s why I’m writing this—to keep you informed and help you ensure their happiness, success, and wellbeing.


Applied Behavior Analysis, or ABA, is the biggest autism therapy in existence. Experts highly recommend it be used as early as possible for the best results. Parents talk about how it’s helped their children improve. Autism organizations—including us at the Autism Site—have spoken about it, funded it, and even petitioned for it.

But for such a widespread therapy, it can be surprisingly controversial. For the sake of the autism community that has grown so close to my heart, I want to tell you about it. I understand this may upset you, and I’m sorry if it does. But there’s something you need to know about ABA: like just about any other therapy, it has a potential dark side. Many adults with autism are speaking out about negative experiences with ABA—experiences that were even abusive or traumatic for them. And as they are the ones with the firsthand experience, autism parents, teachers, and therapists must listen to them; for the sake of our precious and beloved children, we must be careful when choosing a therapy or therapist. And we’re going to help you do that, so read on.

Studying at home can be fun!

About ABA

First, a basic question: what is ABA? Developed by Dr. Ole Ivar Lovaas, it is based on the principles of learning, a la B.F. Skinner. That is, you reward a wanted behavior and punish an unwanted behavior. So ABA in its most basic sense focuses on increasing positive behaviors and decreasing negative or harmful behaviors.

It should also be noted that ABA is not just one technique or type of therapy. Many different methods fall under the ABA umbrella. Some of the more specific forms include very structured programs, like Discrete Trial Training (DTT) and Errorless Instruction, as well as more naturalistic programs, like Pivotal Response Training (PRT) and the Early Start Denver Model. Additionally, some forms of therapies are just called “ABA” so that insurance will cover it; not all therapies labeled “ABA” are actual ABA.

Though just about any form of ABA (and any form of therapy, really!) has a potential dark side, the most problematic forms of ABA seem to be those that are rigidly structured, like DTT.

Asking the Million Dollar Question

How do we tell if a therapy is employing harmful techniques? We can ask ourselves this question:

“Would I feel good, okay, or comfortable doing this with a neurotypical (NT) child?”

If the answer is no, there is a big problem with the treatment, whether it’s ABA or something else. Because ultimately, kids with autism are just that: kids. They may think or act a little differently from other children, but a neurological difference does not merit unacceptable or harmful treatment; unacceptable treatment is unacceptable treatment, and abuse masquerading as therapy is still abuse. Period.

So let’s address a few of the complaints adults with autism have raised about ABA—and look at it through the lens of that million dollar question.

But first, an important note: we recognize and respect the fact that there are a variety of different parenting styles and opinions on the best way to raise a child, whether NT or on the spectrum. While many individuals found their treatments harmful, people with autism are as diverse as neurotypicals, so there are likely other individuals who found nothing wrong with the ABA treatment they received. Ultimately, you know your child best and know what they need. As we move forward, apply these examples to your unique child, taking or leaving whatever you need.

1. Force Behaviors…with a Smile!

One component of potentially damaging ABA is the element of compliance. That is, forcing a child to complete a certain behavior. Sometimes these behaviors are pretty simple, like “Touch your nose.”

Preschooler boy and developing game with card

Others? Not so much. For example, a BCBA may ask a child with autism to touch something they find repulsive or uncomfortable, in hopes of desensitizing them to that thing. (Though, as one adult with autism points out, that doesn’t happen because sensory issues are a result of the individual’s unique neurotype; in order to get rid of the sensitivity, you’d need to get rid of the autism, which, as we know, is not possible and for many people with autism and their families, is not even desirable. So the idea of “desensitization” is really more about “faking it till you make it”).

Is that in and of itself a bad thing? Not necessarily. The controversy mainly arises when damaging therapies try to force the behavior—regardless of how uncomfortable or even painful it is—and refuse to take “no” for an answer. Especially when a child is not given a break if they become too distressed, and especially if they’re forbidden from using a coping skill like stimming.

And it’s made even more controversial when therapists demand the distressing act be done with a smile or without complaining or showing any outward signs of discomfort.

Now for the question: would we do this with a NT child? Yes, we would make them do things they find unpleasant, like clean their rooms, do their homework, or eat their vegetables. We might even urge them to do something that scares them—like jumping off a pool’s diving board. But would we force it if they start displaying signs of serious, legitimate distress due to to task? Would we give them a break to calm down, or would we stick to our guns? Would we allow them to self-regulate and calm themselves down? And would we make them do it all without complaint or resistance?

2. Eliminate Non-Harmful, Adaptive Behaviors That Are Unusual

People with autism display non-harmful behaviors that those without it typically do not, like stimming, maintaining special and specific interests, or avoiding eye contact. All of these behaviors serve a purpose of some sort. Eye contact for people with autism is often uncomfortable, awkward, or even physically painful for them. Stimming is used to self-regulate, increase or decrease stimuli, and self-express. Special interests make them happy and, as Cynthia Kim, a woman with Asperger’s, says, they’re “shelter from the storm.” These behaviors make them comfortable and are a natural form of self-expression or movement.

Yet some therapies will try to squelch or even punish these “unusual,” nonharmful behaviors simply for the sake of making a child appear more “normal.”

Kinder mit Erzieher lesen Buch im Kindergarten

Now for the question: would we do the same thing to a NT child? To give ourselves a better idea, let’s say, for the sake of argument, that these comforting, joy-producing behaviors in NT kids are considered abnormal:

  • Sleeping with a teddy bear at night to feel safer and more secure
  • Scratching a normal, everyday itch on the arm
  • Having an interest in painting, horses, or soccer

And let’s also say that, in this alternative universe, these behaviors do not interfere with daily life, are not distracting or harmful to them or others, and are not inappropriate. They’re simply a little bit out of the ordinary. They might draw eyes or raised eyebrows.

So back to our question: would we try to eliminate or punish such behaviors?

Alternatively, let’s say these “unusual” behaviors were harmful in some way: they interfered with the child’s daily life, they were distracting or harmful to themselves or others, or they were considered inappropriate. Then what would we do? Would we try to eliminate and punish these behaviors whenever they occurred? Would we manage them? Replace them? Whatever your answer may be, the same should apply to a child with autism.

3. Strict Use of Reinforcers

Use of rewards is a pretty important part of ABA, but in some cases, it can be harmful. In controversial ABA, the things a child loves most become reinforcers and these things are sometimes restricted to the context of therapy only. And they’re only given access to the reinforcer if they do everything right and, in some cases, do everything right without complaining or reacting negatively.

When it comes to NT kids, we might do something slightly similar by saying “No TV/video games/internet/texting/dessert until you finish your homework/chores. And we’re limiting the amount you can have.” But there’s a big difference between those two things: a therapy reinforcer for kids with autism could be anything, not just a fun indulgence or time-filler. That includes wholesome activities like reading or being read to, as well as comforting objects like a teddy bear or a favorite toy. In some extreme cases, it could even include affection.

So again, the question: would we apply those same principles to a NT child, if what really motivated them was a book, a toy, or affection? Would we use those things only as a reinforcer, or give them unlimited time with them once they’ve finished their tasks for the day?

sad boy

Proper AUT autismsite_belowcontent
A. Stout received a Bachelor of Arts in Writing through Grand Valley State University, graduating Magna Cum Laude in 2015. In addition to being a passionate autism advocate, she is a member of various fandoms, a study abroad alumna, and an animal lover. She dreams of publishing novels and traveling all over the world someday.